Current event tort Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Current event tort - Article ExampleMr. Rypien, who is the melt down plaintiff in the case, claims he is suffering from brain damage and disturbed mental functions as a direct result of this act by the coalition (Fenno 2012). The league, of course, denies any direct involvement, and contradicts the opinion that any vital information was intentionally kept from the players (Fenno 2012). This is an simulation of many such lawsuits against NFL for the same reasons (Fenno 2012). This is an example of a carnal injury tort lawsuit, in which the defendant is blamed for intentional physical harm to the prosecutor. Lawsuit 2 In Perez v. Deitz, an cyberspace blogger and the user of the web platform, Yelp, is face up a lawsuit worth $750,000, due to her derogatory remarks about the company (Ferenstein 2012). Dietz Development is a home contractor company which is claiming to be losing customers after an Internet user, Jane Perez, published some defamatory remarks about the company on the website Yelp (Ferenstein 2012). ... The Yelp lawyers and critics themselves are of the view that such lawsuits would hamper free speech and the musing of true opinions (Ferenstein 2012). On the other hand, the court seems to hold the Internet users responsible for their words, as their words and comments seem to be having a far-reaching effect, especially on businesses (Ferenstein 2012). This is an example of defamatory tort lawsuits, in which the reputation of the prosecution is at stake, while there is no physical harm. This particular case is, furthermore, an example of SLAPP, or strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation-related lawsuits (Ferenstein 2012). Lawsuit 3 Advocate South Suburban Hospital, and an obstetrician named in the lawsuit, have been sued for negligence and personal physical injury while delivering a baby who is now nine years old when the case is settled (Goldblatt and Smith 2012). Maria Cavanaugh was born to Kari Cavanaugh through a normal delivery in th e mentioned hospital, while the mother was taking the pill called Pitocin (Goldblatt and Smith 2012). This drug is currently widely popular among expecting mothers, who are prescribed this to hasten labor and overcome the labor period (Goldblatt and Smith 2012). Although relatively safe before delivery, it is supposed to be cut off near term to minimize its side set up (Goldblatt and Smith 2012). Kari was also prescribed this drug, however, the nurses and the doctor actually increased the dose of the drug instead of discontinuing it, leading to toxic side effects incurred to the baby, who developed cerebral palsy and intense brain damage (Goldblatt and Smith 2012). According